Natalie Alderson, AJ
Skiles, James Kono, and Zack De Piero
Independent Study – F’15
Independent Study – F’15
Ethnography and Ethnographic Writing
Overview
Ethnography is,
essentially, investigating what makes a specific culture a specific culture.
It’s based in participant observation (as a research method) so it’s
largely anthropological, but it’s informed by the ideas in the linguistics and
communication/Writing Studies fields. Part of the
idea/purpose of doing ethnography and thinking ethnographically is to
understand how cultures/groups function from the bottom, up. What are the participants’
perspectives? What are the power
relations? How are ideas negotiated,
and why? These are some of the
many questions that can be tackled in an ethnography, which requires gathering
data via observation and interview, analyzing data, gathering more if/when
necessary, and formulating theories.
Weekly Blog Reflections: Guiding Questions on
Content, Real World Connections, and “Moves”
In addition to the
questions in the first paragraph, I hope that these readings will help us to think ethnographically. So what does that mean, really? What is/n’t ethnography, and why? Considering the definitions and
descriptions of the following terms/ideas should help us do that: culture, native’s perspective, grounded theory,
thick description, discourse communities, and activity system/theory.
How can these terms/ideas help us better understand ethnography and
ethnographic writing? What real
world connections can you make between these ideas and your own experiences (or
others’ experiences)?
Lastly, I’d like you to think
back to Mike Bunn’s piece “How to Read Like a Writer” (RLW) and read like a
writer. What structural
strategies, literary styles, or individual “moves” are particularly well-suited
for ethnographies? Other questions
to consider here include: what
constitutes effective evidence?, what’s the role of the writer within the
piece?, and what kind of stance does
he/she adopt?
I’d also like you to post
responses to your classmates’ blogs each week. There aren’t any minimum specifications; use your judgment
for what’s appropriate. Please try
to include critical, open-ended questions in your responses.
Comparing and Contrasting Good Ethnographies Assignments:
By the end of the
quarter, I’d like you to find two pieces of good
ethnographic writing, make a case for how/why they each represent an
ethnography, and compare/contrast their conventions. Analyze the ethnographic content that the writers included
as well as the textual “moves” that they made in the piece. Articulate what, exactly, you like
about each pieces—re: content and moves—and how you could repurpose something
similar for your own future ethnographic work. I’d like this paper to be approximately 5 pages.
Week (Date)
|
Reading Due
|
Writing Due
|
Week
1: 10/5 – 10/9
|
Kahn,
Putting Ethnographic Writing in Context
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
2: 10/12 – 10/16
|
Peshkin,
Goodness of Qualitative Research
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
3: 10/19 – 10/23
|
Charmaz,
Grounded Theory
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
4: 10/26 – 10/30
|
Geertz,
Thick Description
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
5: 11/2 – 11/6
|
John
Swales, The Concept of Discourse Community
Branick,
Coaches Can Read Too: An Ethnographic Study of a Football Coaching Discourse
Community
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
6: 11/9 – 11/13
|
Wardle,
Activity Theory: An Introduction for the Writing Classroom.
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
7: 11/16 – 11/20
|
Humphreys
and Watson, Ethnographic Practices: From Writing Up Ethnographic Research to
Writing Ethnography.
|
Blog
post + responses to classmates
|
Week
8: 11/23 – 11/27
|
Good Ethnography Assignment
(proposal of 3 potential pieces)
|
|
Week
9: 11/30 – 12/4
|
Good Ethnography Assignment
(draft + peer/reader review workshop)
|
|
Week
10: 12/7 – 12/11
|
Good Ethnography Assignment
(final)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment